Nuke Mars by Elon Musk | Will Elon Musk Nuke Mars? | Is Nuking Mars a Safe Option

Scientists and science fiction writers are involved in the idea of ​​the Mars landscape in the better of the century. The red planet turning green is seen as a milestone for humanity, which has become a space creature.

The latest suggestion is that it can be done by launching nuclear weapons on Mars. Theoretically, an explosion emits CO2 and create a greenhouse effect, which increases its temperature.

Nuke Mars refers to a continuous stream of very low fallout nuclear fusion explosions above the atmosphere to create artificial suns. Much like our sun, this would not cause Mars to become radioactive.

It sounds crazy But there are many other ideas floating around about how we can support Mars for human life. Each of them has its own advantages and challenges. But the common factor for everyone is that they need exponential technology to move forward before it can work.

Elon Musk

Nuking Mars

Nuclear Mars became a virus recently when Elon Musk tweeted that nuclear Mars had used nuclear weapons to topple the Red Planet. It's an idea that Musk has been floating many times over the years, and now that he has T-shirts, Musk has started backing up a bit, stating that he isn't suggesting that there is only one way to get in, just. We search for a wide variety of options.

Maybe we should start by scratching the nook from the whole list. In addition to ethical and legal issues, this could require us to install about 3,000 nukes on Mars per day for about 7 weeks, long before it ends we run out of nuclear power.

For other ideas, we can turn to sci-fi writers and scientists, including Karl-Sagan and NASA.NASA launched the Martian Habitat: A Guide to Planetary Ecosystems in 1976 that revealed photosynthetic life. And polar ice caps as a possible way to defeat Mars melting

Today we will understand how NASA feels about Mars' terrain. But first, let's take a look at some of the other possible ways we can do this.

Meet with applicants

Asteroids today play an important role in making Earth a greener planet. We may try to do this by damaging many small or large asteroids on Mars. Attacks by celestial bodies emit a large amount of CO2, just like water.

If it were a way of cooking, the terform would get to Mars using the glass as follows: creating a large space mirror around the distance between Washington, D.C. and Philadelphia. Reflects the sun's rays on Mars to vaporize the carbon dioxide trapped on Earth to trigger the greenhouse effect. Bake until ready

The genetically engineered pathogens could be one way to create a breathable environment on Mars through microbial photosynthesis. They will face dire living conditions. But Israel's latest mission to our moon is proof of just how strong the hardy pathogen is, the Tardigrades don't know how many get on the plane and may be alive. (And if so, they might wonder what happened to them).

We can also try the industrial revolutionary forehand. This includes setting up plants on Earth for the purpose of producing and releasing gases such as methane, CO2 and CFCs, along with steam. The general tongue-in-cheek article suggests that fossil fuel company decision-makers may get it from the wholesale "export" to Mars.


Follow us on Instagram (@scifitechx) for more such intresting facts

Not clear

The proposed concept is still more like drawing an ice fortress on a piece of paper than a practical solution. The key issue for everyone is that essential materials will be found either on Mars or nearby. For some people, such as asteroids, the answer is no. (Although Mars and Jupiter are plentiful) Others, such as the materials needed to make giant mirrors, remain more vague. The same applies to the amount of water or greenhouse gas trapped on Mars' rocky surface, with most surface-forming processes less likely.

Other issues still need attention For example, the magnetic field around Mars is much less extensive than that around the Earth. As a result, the ability of the planets to block out elements in the atmosphere and harmful solar radiation is low. In other words, we must find solutions or risks leading to the drift of atmospheric elements that occur during the surface formation process in space.

For this reason, it is not surprising that a 2018 NASA study looked at observations of Mars spacecraft over the past 20 years and concluded that it is impossible to landscape Mars with current technology. It is said that "efforts like this in the future will be distant."

Enter exponential technology

You might be asking, "If it's this difficult, why try to shape Mars?" There are a series of answers, including:

The answer to no: that's a good question.
Everest's response: because it's there, and we might as well.
Depressing answer: We are using up our current world and may need a new one.
Star Trek counterattack: It is the first step in taking heroic moves where no one has been before.
Regardless of what answer you want, it seems that colonization on the global red planet will require a surface formation, which is technologically impossible today. In short, we should focus on addressing the risks posed by humans that could make Earth's environment more similar to Mars or Venus.

However, if exponential technology teaches us anything, progress is likely to occur faster than we expect. Colonizing Mars through the landscape could be faster than we thought.

Exhibit A is a small thought experiment. Imagine going back a few decades and offering an outline for science fiction writers. The story will have a serial entrepreneur. First, he helped generate virtual income before forming an electric (semi) self-propelled vehicle company and reusable space rocket enterprise. He is going to fly people on a moon trip. Oh, and his newest idea is to build Mars using nuclear weapons. That writer is incredibly likely to dismiss that excuse not to make a good story.

Elon Musk on Twitter 😉
Nuke Mars!

Comments